Assignment Manager
Assignment Briefs
Log In
Register
About
Assignment Manager
Assignment Briefs
Log In
Register
About
Mark Assignment
Progression - Suits
Progression - Suits
Unit ID (from markbook):
Group ID (from markbook):
Local output folder for feedback of assignments
No Groups Added Yet
Choose A Group/Class
Manually Enter Student's Group
Add Groups/Class
Choose Student to Mark
Which Student?
Manually Enter Student's Name
Student ID
Change Assessor Name?
Due Date
IV Date
Marked Date
Feedback Date
Criteria
AC1 Informing ideas
Ungraded
Limited or inappropriate research and investigation. Information has not been used to inform ideas or understanding.
Pass
Generally competent research and investigation used to interpret briefs, develop ideas for work and inform plans for progression, showing adequate understanding of industry and the work of others.
Merit
Effective research and investigation skills used to interpret briefs, develop ideas for work and inform plans for progression, showing a clear understanding of industry and the work of others.
Distinction
Accomplished research, investigation and critical analysis skills used to interpret briefs, develop ideas for work and inform plans for progression, showing a thorough understanding of industry and the work of others.
AC1 Informing ideas
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
Research fashion job roles and present your findings
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
Research into possible styled themes for own work
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
AC2 Problem solving
Ungraded
Lack of clarity in use of problem-solving processes. Work does not progress coherently through appropriate stages of development in order to find solutions.
Pass
Generally competent use of development process showing sufficient ideas generation, experimentation and review to find solutions.
Merit
Sound use of ideas generation, experimentation, testing and review. Clear reflection on work showing emerging awareness of how solutions relate to intended meaning, purpose and function.
Distinction
Thorough use of ideas generation, experimentation, testing and review. Confident and independent approach to problem-solving, showing a sophisticated understanding of how solutions relate to intended meaning, purpose and function. Innovative and imaginative solutions demonstrated.
AC2 Problem solving
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
Respond to feedback, evaluate own personal qualities, and relate own practical skills to progression aims and identify gaps.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
AC3 Technical skill
Ungraded
Limited technical skills and understanding demonstrated through incomplete or poorly executed work.
Pass
Sufficient technical skills and understanding demonstrated through mostly accurate execution of work. Some errors may be evident.
Merit
Accurate and confident use of technical skills and understanding demonstrated through well-executed work. Minor errors may be evident but do not detract from overall quality.
Distinction
Highly accurate and confident use of advanced technical skills and understanding demonstrated through expertly executed work. No errors evident.
AC3 Technical skill
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
Present information in a way that is accessible, attractive and useful to others
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
Construct a professional standard sample garment using industrial equipment.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
Create promotional materials for your own (and or) someone elses work using appropriate equipment and technologies
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
AC4 Evaluation and reflection
Ungraded
Limited evidence of reflective practice or evaluation. No self-awareness demonstrated.
Pass
Basic evidence of reflective practice or evaluation. Emerging self-awareness demonstrated.
Merit
Good evidence of reflective practice or evaluation. Clear self-awareness demonstrated, leading to improvements in work.
Distinction
Sophisticated evidence of reflective practice or evaluation. Deep self-awareness demonstrated, leading to significant improvements in work.
AC4 Evaluation and reflection
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
Organise own work, monitor progress complete it in a timely fashion.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
Recognise areas of own strength and areas in need of development.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
Address colleagues appropriately.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
Address representatives of organisations appropriately.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
AC5 Communication
Ungraded
Poor communication skills demonstrated through unclear, poorly presented work.
Pass
Sufficient communication skills demonstrated through clear presentation of work.
Merit
Effective communication skills demonstrated through confident and articulate presentation of work.
Distinction
Highly effective communication skills demonstrated through sophisticated and engaging presentation of work.
AC5 Communication
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
Select the most appropriate work to present in a professional format, using correct technical terminology.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
Develop personal communication skills by working with others.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
Give your overall comment please
Save and Download feedback Doc
Copy Text to Comment Box
Update Pro-Monitor
×
×
Please wait...
×
local_cafe
Enjoying this?
Buy me a coffee