Assignment Manager
Assignment Briefs
Log In
Register
About
Assignment Manager
Assignment Briefs
Log In
Register
About
Mark Assignment
A-level computing project
A-level Computing
Unit ID (from markbook):
Group ID (from markbook):
Local output folder for feedback of assignments
No Groups Added Yet
Choose A Group/Class
Manually Enter Student's Group
Add Groups/Class
Choose Student to Mark
Which Student?
Manually Enter Student's Name
Student ID
Choose grade
PASS
MERIT
DISTINCTION
REFERRAL
What is the overall grade
Change Assessor Name?
Due Date
IV Date
Marked Date
Feedback Date
Criteria
Analysis
Yes/No
YES
NOT ACHIEVED
NOT SUBMITTED
Did they achieve this criteria?
Max 10 Marks
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
9-10 marks Described and justified the features that make the problem solvable by computational methods, explaining why it is amenable to a computational approach. Identified suitable stakeholders for the project and described them explaining how they will make use of the proposed solution and why it is appropriate to their needs. Researched the problem in depth looking at existing solutions to similar problems, identifying and justifying suitable approaches based on this research. Identified the essential features of the proposed computational solution explaining these choices. Identified and explained with justification any limitations of the proposed solution. Specified and justified the requirements for the solution including (as appropriate) any hardware and software requirements. Identified and justified measurable success criteria for the proposed solution.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
6-8 marks Described the features that make the problem solvable by computational methods and why it is amenable to a computational approach. Identified suitable stakeholders for the project and described them and how they will make use of the proposed solution and why it is appropriate to their needs. Researched the problem in depth looking at existing solutions to similar problems identifying and describing suitable approaches based on this research. Identified and described the essential features of the proposed computational solution. Identified and explained any limitations of the proposed solution. Specified the requirements for the solution including (as appropriate) any hardware and software requirements. Identified measurable success criteria for the proposed solution.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
3-5 marks Described the features that make the problem solvable by computational methods. Identified suitable stakeholders for the project and described how they will make use of the proposed solution. Researched the problem looking at existing solutions to similar problems identifying some appropriate features to incorporate into their solution. Identified the essential features of the proposed computational solution. Identified and described some limitations of the proposed solution. Identified most requirements for the solution. Identified some measurable success criteria for the proposed solution.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
1-2 marks Identified some features that make the problem solvable by computational methods. Identified suitable stakeholders for the project and described them and some of their requirements. Identified some appropriate features to incorporate into their solution. Identified some features of the proposed computational solution. Identified some limitations of the proposed solution. Identified some requirements for the solution. Identified some success criteria for the proposed solution.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
Design
Yes/No
YES
NOT ACHIEVED
NOT SUBMITTED
Did they achieve this criteria?
Max 15 Marks
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
13-15 marks Broken the problem down systematically into a series of smaller problems suitable for computational solutions, explaining and justifying the process. Defined in detail the structure of the solution to be developed. Described the solution fully using appropriate and accurate algorithms justifying how these algorithms form a complete solution to the problem. Described, justifying choices made, the usability features to be included in the solution. Identified and justified the key variables data structuresclasses (as appropriate to the proposed solution) justifying and explaining any necessary validation. Identified and justified the test data to be used during the iterative development of the solution. Identified and justified any further data to be used in the post development phase.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
9-12 marks Broken the problem down systematically into a series of smaller problems suitable for computational solutions explaining the process. Defined in detail the structure of the solution to be developed. Described the solution fully using appropriate and accurate algorithms explaining how these algorithms form a complete solution to the problem. Described, explaining choices made, the usability features to be included in the solution. Identified and justified the key variables data structuresclasses (as appropriate to the proposed solution) explaining any necessary validation. Identified and justified the test data to be used during the iterative development of the solution. Identified and justified any further data to be used in the post development phase.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
5-8 marks Broken the problem down systematically into a series of smaller problems suitable for computational solutions describing the process. Defined the structure of the solution to be developed. Described the solution fully using appropriate and accurate algorithms. Described the usability features to be included in the solution. Identified the key variables data structuresclasses (as appropriate to the proposed solution) and any necessary validation. Identified the test data to be used during the iterative development of the solution. Identified any further data to be used in the post development phase.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
1-4 marks Described elements of the solution using algorithms. Described some usability features to be included in the solution. Identified the key variablesdata structuresclasses (as appropriate to the proposed solution). Identified some test data to be used during the iterative or post development phase of the process.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
Developing the Coded Solution
Yes/No
YES
NOT ACHIEVED
NOT SUBMITTED
Did they achieve this criteria?
Max 25 Marks
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
13-15 marks Provided evidence of each stage of the iterative development process for a coded solution relating this to the break down of the problem from the analysis stage and explaining what they did and justifying why. Provided evidence of prototype versions of their solution for each stage of the process.The solution will be well structured and modular in nature. Code will be annotated to aid future maintenance of the system.All variables and structures will be appropriately named. There will be evidence of validation for all key elements of the solution. The development will show review at all key stages in the process.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
9-12 marks Provided evidence of each stage of the iterative development process for a coded solution relating this to the break down of the problem from the analysis stage and explaining what they did at each stage. Provided evidence of some prototype versions of their solution. The solution will be modular in nature. Code will be annotated to explain all key components. Most variables and structures will be appropriately named. There will be evidence of validation for most key elements of the solution. The development will show review at most key stages in the process.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
5-8 marks Provided evidence for most stages of the iterative development process for a coded solution describing what they did at each stage. Solution will have some structure. Code will be briefly annotated to explain key components. Some variable andor structure names will be largely appropriate. There will be evidence of some basic validation. There will be evidence that the development was reviewed at some stage during the process.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
1-4 marks Provided evidence of some iterative development for a coded solution. Solution may be linear. Code may be inefficient. Code may not be annotated appropriately. Variable names may be inappropriate. There will be little or no evidence of validation. There will be little evidence of review during the development.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
Testing to inform development
Yes/No
YES
NOT ACHIEVED
NOT SUBMITTED
Did they achieve this criteria?
Max 10 Marks
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
9-10 marks Provided evidence of testing at each stage of the iterative development process. Provided evidence of any failed tests and the remedial actions taken with full justification for any actions taken.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
6-8 marks Provided evidence of testing at most stages of the iterative development process. Provided evidence of some failed tests and the remedial actions taken with some explanation of the actions taken.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
3-5 marks Provided some evidence of testing during the iterative development process. Provided evidence of some failed tests and the remedial actions taken.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
1-2 marks Provided some evidence of testing during the iterative development process.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
Evaluation
Yes/No
YES
NOT ACHIEVED
NOT SUBMITTED
Did they achieve this criteria?
Max 20 Marks
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
5 marks Provided annotated evidence of post development testing for function and robustness. Provided annotated evidence for usability testing.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
3-4 marks Provided annotated evidence of post development testing for function. Provided annotated evidence for usability testing.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
2 marks Provided evidence of final product testing for function.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
1 mark Provided evidence of some post development testing.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
Evaluation of Solution
Yes/No
YES
NOT ACHIEVED
NOT SUBMITTED
Did they achieve this criteria?
15 Marks
Which Sub-Criteria Have they achieved?
content_copy
13-15 marks Used the test evidence to cross reference with the success criteria to evaluate the solution explain how the evidence shows that the criteria has been fully, partially or not met in each case. Provided comments on how any partially or unmet criteria could be addressed in further development. Provided evidence of the usability features justifying their success, partial success or failure as effective usability features. Provided comments on how any issues with partially or unmet usability features could be addressed in further development. Considered maintenance issues and limitations of the solution. Described how the program could be developed to deal with limitations and potential improvementschanges. There is a well developed line of reasoning which is clear and logically structured. The information presented is relevant and substantiated.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
9-12 marks Used the test evidence to cross reference with the success criteria to evaluate the solution identifying whether the criteria have been met, partially met or unmet. Provided comments on how any partially or not met criteria could be addressed in further development. Provided evidence of the usability features. Considered maintenance issues and limitations of the solution. There is a line of reasoning presented with some structure. The information presented is in the most part relevant and supported by some evidence.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
5-8 marks Cross referenced some of the test evidence with the success criteria and commented on the success or otherwise of the solution. Provided evidence of usability features. Identified some limitations on the solution. The information has some relevance and is presented with limited structure. The information is supported by limited evidence.
Achieved
Not Achieved
content_copy
1-4 marks Commented on the success or failure of the solution with some reference to test data. The information is basic and communicated in an unstructured way. The information is supported by limited evidence and the relationship to the evidence may not be clear.
Achieved
Not Achieved
Auto-fill
How well did they meet the criteria?
Give your overall comment please
Save and Download feedback Doc
Copy Text to Comment Box
Update Pro-Monitor
×
×
Please wait...
×
local_cafe
Enjoying this?
Buy me a coffee